PHOTO: Harry Mullins tried to buy a home that was underquoted, wasting time and money on something he could not afford. CREDIT: SIMON SCHLUTER
Harry Mullins was trying to buy a home, and thought he was in with a chance.
The real estate agent said the vendors wanted $649,000, well within Mr Mullins’ budget, so he paid for a building inspection and turned up to bid at auction.
But it turned out the vendors wanted much more than $649,000 and, when bidding reached $700,000, the property passed in.
Underquoting is in the crosshairs of a fresh Victorian government review that will also examine conduct within the real estate industry.
The practice can waste buyers’ time, money and opportunities as they chase after homes with a sticker price they can afford, but which sell for much more on auction day.
Underquoting can occur in Victoria when a property is advertised at a price that is less than the estimated selling price, is less than the seller’s asking price, or has already been rejected by the seller. But it is hard to prove.
READ MORE VIA SMH
View this post on Instagramadsense
MOST POPULAR
- Is New Zealand heading for a property market crash?
- Sir John Key to partner with Chow brothers in property development firm
- House prices expected to fall further than previously forecast – ASB
- Abandoned land for sale
- Trade Me sends warning to website
- Boss degrades real estate agents ‘who have done f*** all’ at awards night | UK (WATCH)
- Melissa Caddick’s parents and husband face being HOMELESS | AUSTRALIA
- Some homeowners have been caught out by recent tax measures
- New Zealand named in top 10 most expensive countries to buy a house in
- ‘Weaker than we’d normally expect’ – House sales drop to lowest levels since 1992